Reflect on how to create AI-resilient assessments that uphold integrity and learning values.

🔁 Section 5: Reflection — Try This

We invite you to reflect honestly and practically — not just on tasks, but on the values shaping your assessment design.

💭 Reflect

  • Are any of my current assessments vulnerable to AI misuse?
  • Do my tasks focus on product only, or also on thinking and process?
  • Have I made space for kōrero about AI with my class?

🧪 Try This

Choose one practical action:

  • Rewrite an existing task to surface process over product.

  • Draft an AI Use Declaration to pilot with your learners.

  • Run a critique activity: “Here’s what AI produced — how would you improve it?”

  • Add one reflective question to your next assessment:

    “What did AI miss — and why does that matter?”


🪶 Kaupapa Māori Lens — Whaiwhakaaro | Reflection

Building on the tikanga foundations from Module 1, reflect through these guiding principles:

  • Mana — Does this assessment allow learners’ authentic voice and authority to shine?
  • Kaitiakitanga — Am I teaching students to be guardians, not just consumers, of knowledge?
  • Whanaungatanga — Does this build trust, or create fear?
  • Pūtaketanga / Whakapapa — Am I teaching students to trace and honour the lineage of knowledge?
  • Pono — Does my design invite integrity, or provoke shortcuts?

💭 Try this

Choose one assessment and ask yourself:

“Does this work have mana?”

  • If yes, how can I strengthen that further?
  • If no, what changes are needed to restore it?