Reflect on how to create AI-resilient assessments that uphold integrity and learning values.
🔁 Section 5: Reflection — Try This
We invite you to reflect honestly and practically — not just on tasks, but on the values shaping your assessment design.
💭 Reflect
- Are any of my current assessments vulnerable to AI misuse?
- Do my tasks focus on product only, or also on thinking and process?
- Have I made space for kōrero about AI with my class?
🧪 Try This
Choose one practical action:
-
Rewrite an existing task to surface process over product.
-
Draft an AI Use Declaration to pilot with your learners.
-
Run a critique activity: “Here’s what AI produced — how would you improve it?”
-
Add one reflective question to your next assessment:
“What did AI miss — and why does that matter?”
🪶 Kaupapa Māori Lens — Whaiwhakaaro | Reflection
Building on the tikanga foundations from Module 1, reflect through these guiding principles:
- ✓ Mana — Does this assessment allow learners’ authentic voice and authority to shine?
- ✓ Kaitiakitanga — Am I teaching students to be guardians, not just consumers, of knowledge?
- ✓ Whanaungatanga — Does this build trust, or create fear?
- ✓ Pūtaketanga / Whakapapa — Am I teaching students to trace and honour the lineage of knowledge?
- ✓ Pono — Does my design invite integrity, or provoke shortcuts?
💭 Try this
Choose one assessment and ask yourself:
“Does this work have mana?”
- If yes, how can I strengthen that further?
- If no, what changes are needed to restore it?